Compare the cost of three project-management options on the same team size and planning horizon. Enter the current plan prices you are considering to avoid making a decision from stale or mismatched headline pricing.
Pricing and product packaging change. Enter current per-user or per-license figures from each vendor's live pricing page or quote, then normalize them to the same team size.
| Product | Current monthly equivalent / user | One-time implementation / migration | Annual extras |
|---|---|---|---|
| Asana | |||
| Microsoft Project / Planner option | |||
| Wrike |
This calculator deliberately avoids hard-coded vendor prices so the comparison stays useful when plans or packaging change.
Validate the plan that contains the workflow, reporting, automation, security and portfolio capabilities your team actually requires.
Confirm the current Microsoft product, licensing unit, included Microsoft 365 capabilities and any dependencies before normalizing cost.
Validate the required tier, user model, advanced capabilities, integrations and implementation expectations against your buying requirements.
Use live vendor prices for the arithmetic, but keep your comparison framework stable: same users, same horizon, same must-have capabilities and the same implementation assumptions.
After comparing Asana, Microsoft Project and Wrike, benchmark your assumptions against broader 2026 project management software pricing.
Compare 2026 Pricing Benchmarks →Sponsored affiliate resource. PMWorld360 may earn compensation for qualifying actions.
These products can all support project work, but they are not interchangeable. Asana emphasizes collaborative work management and adoption, Microsoft Project/Planner options emphasize Microsoft ecosystem alignment and formal planning at higher tiers, and Wrike combines collaborative work management with deeper workflow, request and resource-management capabilities on higher plans.
| Decision area | Asana | Microsoft Project / Planner | Wrike |
|---|---|---|---|
| Best fit | Cross-functional teams prioritizing usability and workflow coordination | Organizations invested in Microsoft 365 and/or formal project planning | Teams needing configurable workflows, requests, proofing or resource controls |
| Entry pricing context | Free tier; Starter about $10.99/user/month annually | Planner Plan 1 about $10/user/month; higher Project capabilities at higher tiers | Free tier; Team about $10/user/month annually |
| Advanced tier context | Advanced about $24.99/user/month annually | Planner and Project Plan 3 about $30/user/month; Plan 5 about $55 | Business about $25/user/month annually |
| Ease of adoption | Generally strong for broad business teams | Varies significantly by Microsoft product and planning depth | Powerful but can require more configuration |
| Resource/portfolio depth | Available in higher plans | Strong formal planning capabilities in higher Project tiers | Strong resource/workflow capabilities in higher plans |
Your priority is getting cross-functional teams to coordinate work consistently without turning every project into a formal scheduling exercise. Validate the plan required for portfolios, workload, goals, time tracking and enterprise controls because those capabilities can change the cost comparison.
Your organization already standardizes on Microsoft 365, or project managers need more formal scheduling and planning capabilities. Be precise about which Microsoft product and license you are comparing: Planner-oriented work management and higher Project plans serve different levels of planning rigor.
You need configurable request intake, custom workflows, proofing, cross-team visibility or resource controls and are comfortable investing more in setup. As with Asana, many advanced capabilities sit above the entry tier, so compare the plan you would actually deploy.
Using representative annual-billing list prices, 50 seats at $10–$10.99 per user/month is roughly $6,000–$6,594 per year before implementation or add-ons. At roughly $25 per user/month, the annual subscription is about $15,000. A Microsoft option at $30 per user/month would be about $18,000. These examples are not quotes; they show why required-tier selection matters more than entry pricing.
Build the same representative project in each finalist. Test intake, dependencies, recurring work, workload, an executive status view, one approval, one automation and your most important integration. Have everyday users—not only administrators—complete the test. Capture setup effort and reporting quality alongside subscription cost.
Pricing context reflects publicly reported 2026 pricing reviewed in August 2026 and may change. Confirm current vendor pricing before purchase.
Pricing note: Pricing examples are planning references, not vendor quotes. Confirm current pricing, billing terms, included features, seat minimums and add-ons on the vendor's official pricing page before purchase.
That depends on the current plan, licensing model, team size and capabilities you require. Compare the lowest plan from each vendor that actually meets your needs.
Software prices and packaging change. Using current prices from vendor pages or quotes reduces the risk of making a purchase decision from stale figures.
Include implementation, migration, integrations, training, add-ons, administrator effort and any required higher-tier capabilities.
Use the pricing guide to validate the wider cost picture before requesting quotes or selecting a plan.
Get the 2026 Pricing Guide →Sponsored affiliate resource. PMWorld360 may earn compensation for qualifying actions.
Updated: August 26, 2026 • Topic: Project management software selection and evaluation
This resource is designed to help project professionals evaluate software using practical requirements, cost, usability, implementation, governance and operating-fit considerations. Product pricing, packaging and features can change; verify current vendor terms before making a purchase decision.
Editorial independence: PMWorld360 may earn compensation from qualifying partner referrals. Commercial relationships do not determine the evaluation criteria, comparison conclusions or recommended decision process on this page.