Risk register: Do your risk descriptions meet the bar?

A key element that contributes to the clear understanding of any risk is its description or definition usually found in one of the first columns of the risk register. Based on this simple description, we will support an entire risk process. There is no room for being vague or unclear. Unfortunately, we generally spend no time or thought on this important component which might lead us to over or underestimate the risks of the project in the long run.

The project has started, and with it, a brand-new risk register is created, being filled with our understanding of risk and the requirements for the job at hand. The team is busy setting up for a risk identification meeting, and participant are being invited or scheduled to participate. Before you know it, that risk register has taken a life of its own and contains a lot of details that should assist us in making the right decisions for the project going forward.

For a lot of projects out there, this would be the way that we establish our risk register. As time progresses, not to mention, with the help of progressive elaboration, the PM and the team generate a valuable risk register. Over the years, I have seen this exercise create a small but easy to fix problem which could make our work on risk management better as we go forward if we address it early in the risk process. That small problem is the result of us trying to cut time out of the identification process. We do not spend enough time on our description of the risk so that it is framed properly.

Look at any recent risk register from your organization. Tell me what you see in the risk description column? For most, it will be something similar to weather, inflation, a rise in the price of gasoline, or the quality of part ABC…

What is wrong with this picture?

Well, it does not really provide a complete or clear description, and it certainly does not paint a picture of our risk in a way that it is easy to analyze or assign responses or strategies to. Associated with the description is the fact that we clearly need to understand the extent or magnitude of the risk in order to make future decisions that can handle the totality of that risk.

What is a proper definition that would help us in our risk management process?

I do not pretend to have the perfect solution, but years ago, when I was first introduced to risk management, a wise manager in the risk department I worked in introduced me to a simple formula that I have in turn used countless times and taught most of my students.

IF [Event], THEN [Consequences] This is as basic as you can take it and you have to admit is easy to remember. It just flows as one thinks it.

I have since researched this topic and found others that go a bit deeper in their elaboration of risk. In a briefing published in 2004, Dr. David Hillson, who suggested that risk events should be documented on our ability to understand the risk based on three key components: management, ownership, and reporting. So, it stands to reason that one description must address a variety of factors, not all contained in a word.

Below are some of the most common description formulas that I have found or have seen used in organizations:

  1. An <uncertain risk event> could occur due to <definite cause or trigger>, leading to <impact on objectives>. This is also recognized as Total Economic Impact (TEI) model.
  2. [Event that has an effect on objectives], caused by [cause(s)] resulting in [consequence(s)] (XSEDE, Nayak, 2018)
  3. A condition can cause an uncertain outcome and the likely consequences (negative) if it is not managed

Where did we lose our way?

It seems that over time, project managers have started to not pay as much attention to their risk descriptions and the impact of not having a full fledge risk statement.

Part of the problem is related to going through the planning stage as fast as we can which causes issues in a number of ways (i.e., weak requirements gathering, not performing a deeper analysis, etc…) including this one. Cutting corners here will lead to further problems in risk planning as we will need precise information in order to analyze, provide risk response strategies and plans as well as assign ownership to our risks.

If you find your risk register lean in the definition section, going forward ask your team to slow it down a bit when it comes to describing the risk events. You might want to have a quick review session on best practices for doing this which can involve practicing and playing with the formulas I introduced in this article.

I have in my office a laminated copy pinned to my wall that serves as a reminder of both doing it right and slowing myself down so that I do not have problems at a later point.

At the end of the day, this goes to show why we do risk management in the first place: to deal with our lack of information which brings uncertainty to the project. It should start with a properly defined description of the risk event.

 

Similar content:

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Back to top button
0
Close